Past Events & Activities

Primary Sources

Tutorials

Lesson Plans

Links and Resources

Meet our partners
Staff/Management Plan
Contact Us!

 

 

 

 

Return to this topic's index page


Visit other sections
in this topic:

Content Session Material
Primary Sources
Resources and Links

 

 

 

Farmers and Fishermen: Work in Essex County, 1650-1850
Content Session Material

Theme: An Industrious People: American Economic History
Topic: 
Farmers and Fishermen: Work in Essex County, 1650-1850
Date: Spring 2006
Scholar: Daniel Vickers, Ph.D. Professor, Department of History, University of California, San Diego

Overview | Required Reading | Reading Questions

Materials selected and syllabus compiled by Daniel Vickers, PhD., Professor, Department of History, University of California, San Diego.


OVERVIEW

The big question that we will raise in the seminar will be what distinguished the pre-industrial world of work from our own.  Were these farmers and fishermen fundamentally different from us?  Are the differences that separate us from them ones of behavior or of fundamental values? What sorts of behavior or which values?  My book and both articles are fundamentally about men of European origin.  Do you think colonial women or Native Americans would have regarded economic matters any differently?

|return to top|


REQUIRED READING

Vickers, Daniel.  “Competency and Competition:  Economic Culture in Early America,” William and Mary Quarterly 47 no. 1 (1990):  3-29.

Vickers, Daniel. Farmers and Fishermen:  Two Centuries of Work in Essex County, Massachusetts, 1630-1850.  Chapel Hill:  University of North Carolina Press, 1994.

Vickers, Daniel. “Those Damned Shad:  Would the River Fisheries of New England Have Survived in the Absence of Industrialization?” William and Mary Quarterly 61 no. 4 (2004):685-712.

RECOMMENDED READING

--none suggested-

|return to top|


READING QUESTIONS

There is a longstanding debate amongst American historians about whether or not the period, 1790-1840, constituted a dividing line in the social history of the United States. Carl Degler, on the one hand, has argued that "capitalism came in the first ships." James Henretta, on the other hand argues that in the pre-industrial period, American culture was non-capitalist or even "anti-capitalist" in its character.  Which seems to best characterize the period, and why do historians argue the point?  

Where do you think I stand?

Try to imagine how somebody might argue against my two articles.


|return to top|